Reference Guide

WCAG 3.0 Key Concepts and Terminology

A reference guide to the new vocabulary and conceptual framework that underpins WCAG 3.0. Understand guidelines, requirements, methods, assertions, functional needs, and outcomes.

6 Core Concepts
New Framework
Reference Guide

How WCAG 3.0 Concepts Connect

The relationship between the core building blocks of the WCAG 3.0 framework.

Functional NeedsUser perspectiveGuidelinesOutcome statementsRequirementsTestable provisionsCoreSuppl.Assert.MethodsTech-specificAssertionsOrganizational commitmentsDrives the framework12 categories3 typesNormative tests

Concept Deep Dive

Each of the six core concepts explained in detail, with WCAG 2.x comparisons and practical examples.

Evolved

Guidelines

Definition

Outcome statements that describe what accessible content should achieve. Rather than abstract organizational groupings, WCAG 3.0 guidelines are actionable outcome descriptions.

WCAG 2.x Equivalent

"Guidelines" existed in WCAG 2.x but were more abstract organizational groupings under the four POUR principles (Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, Robust).

Example

"Users can perceive all non-decorative images through text alternatives" is a WCAG 3.0 guideline outcome — specific, measurable, and user-centered.

Key Insight

Guidelines in WCAG 3.0 are organized into 12 functional categories rather than 4 principles, providing more granular and practical groupings.

Redesigned

Requirements

Definition

WCAG 3 has three types of provisions: core requirements, which must all be met to conform; supplemental requirements, which build on the core set and are not required to conform; and assertions, which are documented statements about accessibility practices an organization follows.

WCAG 2.x Equivalent

"Success Criteria" in WCAG 2.x served a similar role, but WCAG 3.0 requirements are more granular and introduce assertions as an entirely new type.

Example

A core requirement might be: "All non-decorative images have a text alternative that describes the image’s purpose."

Key Insight

These are provision types, not levels. Conformance depends only on the core requirements; supplemental requirements and assertions feed the separate reporting tiers.

Upgraded

Methods

Definition

Technology-specific approaches for meeting requirements, with detailed test procedures and expected results. Methods tell you exactly how to test a given requirement for a specific technology.

WCAG 2.x Equivalent

"Techniques" in WCAG 2.x were informative and advisory. WCAG 3.0 ties methods more tightly to conformance: the methods you rely on must be accessibility supported.

Example

An HTML method for image alternatives might include: check for the alt attribute, verify it describes the image purpose, and ensure decorative images use an empty alt.

Key Insight

A method only counts toward conformance if browsers and assistive technologies in general use actually support it. WCAG 3 calls this being accessibility supported, and the accessibility support set must be stated in a conformance claim.

Entirely New

Assertions

Definition

Documented organizational commitments requiring evidence. Organizations publicly state what they provide for accessibility and back it up with documentation, training records, and process descriptions.

WCAG 2.x Equivalent

No equivalent exists in WCAG 2.x — this is an entirely new concept introduced in WCAG 3.0.

Example

"We provide accessibility training to all developers" with evidence: training records, certificates, and curriculum documentation.

Key Insight

Assertions acknowledge that real accessibility requires organizational commitment — not just technical fixes. Culture, process, and policy matter.

New Foundation

Functional Needs

Definition

User-need-based groupings that drive the entire framework. They describe what users need to successfully use content, regardless of specific disability categories or medical diagnoses.

WCAG 2.x Equivalent

Partially relates to "Understanding" documents, but WCAG 2.x was organized by technical principles (POUR), not user needs.

Example

"Users who cannot see need text alternatives for visual content" describes a functional need that drives multiple guidelines and requirements.

Key Insight

Centering on functional needs rather than disability categories is more inclusive and technology-resilient — it future-proofs the standard.

New in Sept 2026

Reporting Tiers

Definition

Six cumulative tiers that describe how far a product has got, each one building on the tiers below it: 1 avoid physical harm, 2 foundational access, 3 conformance, 4 Bronze, 5 Silver, 6 Gold. Conformance itself is tier 3, where every core requirement is met.

WCAG 2.x Equivalent

Closest to WCAG 2.x conformance levels (A / AA / AAA), but the September 2026 draft deliberately separates the two ideas. As the editors put it, WCAG 3 “moves the concept of leveling from conformance to reporting”, and uses the phrase “reporting tiers” to keep them distinct from the old “conformance levels”.

Example

A product that meets every core requirement has conformed, and reports at tier 3. Reaching tier 5 (Silver) additionally requires a number of supplemental requirements and assertions about content.

Key Insight

Conformance is a single bar, not a ladder. The tiers exist to report progress toward it and achievements beyond it. This section is still marked exploratory, and the Working Group is openly asking whether tiers or a scoring model works better.

Terminology Mapping: WCAG 2.x to 3.0

A quick reference for how familiar WCAG 2.x terms translate to the new WCAG 3.0 vocabulary.

WCAG 2.x Term
WCAG 3.0 Term
Success Criteria
Requirements (core / supplemental)
Techniques (informative)
Methods (normative)
N/A (new concept)
Assertions
Conformance Levels (A / AA / AAA)
Six reporting tiers
4 Principles (POUR)
12 Guideline Categories
Understanding documents
Functional Needs documentation
Sufficient / Advisory techniques
Core / Supplemental requirements

How It All Fits Together

A worked example tracing image alt text through the entire WCAG 3.0 framework, from user need to organizational commitment.

1
Functional Need

Users who cannot see need text alternatives for visual content.

2
Guideline

Non-decorative images have meaningful text alternatives.

3
Requirement

All informative images have an accessible name describing their purpose.

4
Method

HTML: Check img elements have alt attributes with descriptive text.

5
Assertion

Organization documents its alt text authoring process and QA review.

Essential Accessibility Resources

Comprehensive tools, checklists, and guides to help you create inclusive digital experiences

WCAG 3.0 Guide: W3C Accessibility Guidelines 3.0

Comprehensive guide to WCAG 3.0 with overview, guidelines, comparison, key concepts, and preparation steps
wcag 3.0
wcag 3
View guide

WCAG Success Criteria Guides

In-depth guides to WCAG Level A and AA success criteria with interactive examples, testing methods, and implementation code
wcag
accessibility guidelines
View guide

WCAG 3.0: What to Expect from the New Standard

Explore WCAG 3.0 updates including the 12 guideline categories, the six reporting tiers that replace A/AA/AAA, and how to prepare for the next generation of accessibility guidelines.
wcag
3.0:
View article