Accessibility audits
Manual and automated evaluation with reproducible evidence, user impact, WCAG mapping, and retest options.
Packages from
$950
View scopeFounder-led audits, remediation, and training with reproducible evidence, clear ownership, and reporting in the format your team uses.
Fixed-scope audit packages from $950.
Professional services
Each package publishes its included sample, deliverables, delivery window, assumptions, add-ons, and starting price. Hourly work is used only when a clearly bounded support model is more appropriate.
Compare every packageManual and automated evaluation with reproducible evidence, user impact, WCAG mapping, and retest options.
Packages from
$950
View scopeCode-level implementation support for agreed findings, shared components, focus, semantics, forms, and interaction patterns.
Packages from
$1,250
View scopeRole-specific workshops and practical guidance for design, engineering, QA, content, and product teams.
Packages from
$600
View scopeCommission a scoped audit, remediation sprint, design review, training program, disabled-user study, or conformance documentation engagement.
Use free testing tools, WCAG references, implementation guides, checklists, and research synthesis while keeping human review in the loop.
Research desk
Source-linked synthesis, litigation tracking, and jurisdiction research with methodology, limitations, and citation-ready references.
Open the research hub
Featured synthesis
A source-linked interpretation of large-scale accessibility datasets, with methodology, limitations, downloadable data, and practical context.
Read researchReviewed July 2026
Litigation data
Federal filing trends, reported settlement costs, industry patterns, and documented sources.
Read researchUpdated regularly
Jurisdiction tracker
Compare requirements, standards, deadlines, enforcement, and penalties across major jurisdictions.
Read researchGlobal coverage
Recent blogs
Recent standards analysis, implementation guidance, testing methods, and practical accessibility decisions.
Anthropic shipped Opus 5 today with no accessibility claims at all. The interesting part is buried in a benchmark — and in a fallback that agents have and disabled users do not.
WCAG is written for web pages, and an app has none. WCAG-EM 2.0 now gives you the process and WCAG2ICT gives you the criteria — here is how they fit together on a real app audit.
Nobody certifies WCAG conformance — there is no body that issues it. Here is the difference between a conformance claim, an evaluation statement and a VPAT, and what to demand in procurement.
Delivery formats
The reporting format is agreed before work begins. Accessibility.build does not require clients to adopt a proprietary audit platform or move their workflow into an unfamiliar system.
Inspect a sample reportA sortable findings register with severity, WCAG mapping, evidence, recommendations, ownership, and status fields agreed for the engagement.
A portable report covering scope, methodology, executive summary, detailed findings, recommendations, limitations, and next steps.
A browser-based report or mutually agreed shared document for teams that prefer online review and collaboration.

About the founder
Founder and accessibility consultant with more than four years of experience across auditing, remediation, accessible development, and software testing.
Scope, evidence, severity, limitations, and remediation examples.
InspectManual, automated, keyboard, screen-reader, and retest process.
InspectOwnership, GST status, providers, policies, and buyer documents.
InspectNamed authorship, sourcing, AI disclosure, updates, and corrections.
Inspect
A clear place to begin
Share the product, workflows, deadline, and evidence you need. You will receive a scoped recommendation, not an open-ended hourly estimate.